ISU 63, OSU 50
by mplscyclone
on Dec 6, 2008 3:52 PM CST
in Basketball
This is all copied from my basketball blog section202.blogspot.com. I wanted to ensure there was some type of coverage on the basketball game on this website, but didn't want to reinvent the wheel.
This was a decent game. We did some good things and some bad things as well. There were more people in Hilton than I expected! Definatley more people in Section 202 than there has been all year
Positives:
- Good defense. OSU was shooting about 48% on the year, and we held them to 40%. We forced OSU to take some outside shots and they aren't really an outside shooting team.
- Balanced scoring. Did heavliy rely on 1 guy and all 9 guys who played for us scored
- Rebounding. Wasn't the greatest, but we out rebounded them which is always nice
Negatives:
- Sloppy play - at times we were pretty sloppy with the ball. We had 13 turnovers and many of those turnovers were from being sloppy. OSU got 8 steals on his.
- Post defense - didn't play good D when their slashers drove. We gave them more free throw opporunities than they should've gotten and gave away a couple too many 3 point plays
Areas of improvement:
- Play D when guys are driving. Avoid fouling. Sometimes guys drive and just throw something up hoping to get fouled. Let them shoot that garbage, and if it goes in at least you didn't give them a 3 point play opporunitiy
- Ball pressure. We do a decent job of forcing bad shots and denying post entry, but I'd like to see us get some steals. We didn't get any this game, and only got 1 or 2 at the UNI game. Both OSU and UNI have been commiting more turnovers than assists and those were areas in which we could've opened the game up more
- Consistency in the post. OSU did a pretty good job shutting down Brackins for the most part. Most of Craigs boards where when they weren't contested at all, and most of his scoring was in the 2nd half
Key Stat:
3 point shooting.
ISU was 10 of 23, and OSU was 2 of 19. That was the difference in the game, as both teams shot similarly from inside the arc
Random Thought:
One of my favorite parts of last season was hearing coach yell at his players. I loved hearing "JIRI ......." ALL THE TIME! It seemed like every possession, coach was yelling at Jiri for something he was doing wrong. I can't always hear the details of what he's saying.. I mean I sit in the upper deck across from where Mac stands. The fact that I can hear him is pretty awesome.
Well, this season there isn't that guy, but there are a couple of candidates: JVB and Hamilton. Against UNI, I saw coach on tv yelling "Jamie, MOVE YOUR FEET!!!!!". I heard him yell something similarly to that today as coach was yelling "JAMIE!". I also heard him hell to Hamilton "HAMM, DEFEND HIM!!!".
Basically, this is what I notice with during points where the game is mundane or when we just aren't playing well. It helps me through the slow patches and from getting frustrated.
JVB and Hamm need this type of direction as there is untapped potential in these guys, and they seem to be responding so far. I hope all of our players realize that coach wants to make them a good player, and he isn't being a "hater".
Game MVP: Lucca Staiger - 14 points, 5 of 9 shooting (4 of 8 from 3 point), 4 rebounds, and 3 assists.
Lucca was our leading scorer, and put the nail in the coffin in this game. I was happy to see Lucca play well in front of the home crowd, as he hasn't had that great of a game yet.
Final Thoughts:
- Offense: I want to see some consistency inside. Fortunatley our 3 point shooting bailed us out in this game,but we need to get more points on a regular basis inside. I want to see us have an inside-outside all around game. Not 1 game where we go inside, and 1 game where we shoot a lot of 3s
- Defense: Our guys need to move their feet when guys on driving on them and to try to avoid fouling too much. Fouls will happen occassionally, but it feels like almost everytime someone drives on us, we foul.
Next Game: Tuesday, 12/9 vs. Drake @ Hilton, 8pm tipoff on ESPNU
0 comments
| 0 recs
|
Looking at the Iowa State Men's Basketball Roster
by CrossCyed
on Jul 8, 2008 9:09 PM CDT
in Basketball
It's the middle of July, and I'm in the middle of beating the Cyclones' potential starting football lineup into a bloody pulp by the time late August gets here, so let's take a look at who will be suiting up in the brand spanking new unis this winter. I'm going to take a look at what I imagine will be the starting lineup at the beginning of the season - it'll probably look a bit different at the end.
Projected Starting Lineup
G Diante Garrett
G Bryan Petersen
G Lucca Staiger
F Craig Brackins
F Jamie Vanderbeken
Projected Bench
G Dominique Buckley
G Sean Haluska
G Wes Eikmeier
G Cameron Lee
G Charles Boozer
F Alex Thompson
F LA Pomlee
F Justin Hamilton
F Clinton Mann (redshirt?)
As freshman typically struggle to pick up Greg McDermott's complicated offensive sets, it doesn't make much sense to throw any of them in the starting lineup immediately. The one exception could be newcomer Jamie Vanderbeken, who should be an early favorite to start at the forward position. There is a distinct possibility, however, that Alex Thompson could start early in the year due to his familiarity with the system.
If ISU is truly moving to a dribble-drive offense as rumored, it should be set up for Diante Garrett to run the point. He displayed flashes last year, and didn't struggle the same way that Bryan Petersen did bringing the ball up in traffic. A greater focus on shooting for Petersen should aid his game, as he is one of the best spot up shooters that the Cyclones return.
Lucca Staiger, if he's everything that he's being pumped up to be, will most certainly jump into the starting lineup. He has a sweet outside shot, but, more importantly, he has a body that should be physically ready for Big 12 play. Craig Brackins is an obvious choice as the team's best returning player (as a sophomore, yay), while Vanderbeken should earn the last starting spot based on supposed talent alone.
Whoever doesn't start out of the Vanderbeken/Thompson duo will need to be heavily relied on in the post, with ISU losing most of their rebounding depth from last season. LA Pomlee will likely see time in a role similar to that of Rahshon Clark last year (granted, much small in the way of minutes) as Pomlee, an incredibly raw talent, has a knack for being around the ball. Don't count on him for points, though. Justin Hamilton reportedly ate a small Iowa town this summer, and has a body nearing 250 pounds - useful to bang in the Big 12, but can his game match his size? Clinton Mann is also a question mark after bruising his chest up in Cap City play - he could very well redshirt if the injury is serious.
The guard court will bring back some experience in the form of Sean Haluska, Cameron Lee and Charles Boozer. I was wary of Haluska early on last year. I didn't feel he was as good as people were proclaiming he'd be, but he wasn't as bad as his performance seemed to show. If he can try to start scoring a little earlier this season, he will see meaningful minutes as a guard sub. Lee was the team's defensive stopper, but, since he can't score, he's still not going to play a lot. Boozer's role this year will depend largely on what we can get out of the incoming freshmen. Dominique Buckley is a talented point guard prospect, but, much like the other freshman, will likely need some adjustment time to pick up the offense. Wes Eikmeier is supposed to be a stone cold shooter, but lacks size and may not be able to play defense at the necessary level. He's another redshirt possibility (but replaces Cory Johnson as the Clone Chronicles "Midwestern kid to root for").
This year's team is full of question marks. Much of the success (or disappointment) will hinge on the growth of Diante Garrett at the point guard position. For ISU to become a concern for other teams in the conference, guys will need to step up, and frankly, make some luck.
I still don't think that we're an NIT team, but an above average season could result in postseason possibilities.
2 comments | 0 recs
